this does not invite with justus jackson says of taking the med in search of the law books and putting investigators to work to pen some offense on him? to be ensured that the investigation must be related to the criminal offense specified by statute, but that is often then nothing that prevents it from being very broad. i paraphrase that at the end referring to the judges. what is the concern going forward, that the system, when former presidents are subject to prosecution in the history of wilson versus olson, they tell us it is not going to stop. it will be cycled back and used against the current president or the next president and the next president after that. all that, i want you to try and weigh that concern. why is this not olson versus wilson if we agree with you? >> first of all, the independent counsel regime did have many structural features that emphasize a independence at the expense of accountability. we did not have that regime now, but even under that regime justice kavanaugh, if we look at the report on iran-contra, a ghost of a fundamental point for the court to con